Construction Health and Safety Technician (CHST) Practice Test 2025 – All-in-One Study Guide for Exam Success!

Image Description

Question: 1 / 460

Which Hazard Analysis Method uses deductive or backward thinking logic?

Fault Tree Analysis

Fault Tree Analysis is the method that employs deductive reasoning, which involves starting with a high-level event (usually an undesirable outcome) and working backward to identify the possible causes. This approach allows practitioners to visualize the pathways that can lead to failures and assess contributing factors systematically. By prioritizing risks and focusing on root causes, Fault Tree Analysis helps in understanding how different factors can interrelate to produce a negative outcome, facilitating targeted risk management strategies.

The other methods involve different approaches. Failure Mode Effects Analysis emphasizes proactive identification of potential failure modes and their effects rather than working backward from an undesired event. Job Hazard Analysis is a step-by-step job or task evaluation process that focuses on identifying hazards before the task begins, rather than analyzing a failure after the fact. What-If Analysis involves brainstorming potential problems and is more exploratory than deductive, relying on the creativity of participants to generate possible adverse scenarios. Thus, Fault Tree Analysis stands out for its systematic deduction of causes from a specified event.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Failure Mode Effects Analysis

Job Hazard Analysis

What-If Analysis

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy